Although the deadline for public comments for the 5th Round of public consultation on construction of two residential tower blocks at Area 6f closed two weeks ago, it appears that the record is still incomplete.<\/p>\n
From the comments posted to date, those opposed continue to detail the unanswered questions, and raise new questions on the latest submission. Meanwhile, supporters have little to say other than “support”.<\/p>\n
The bulk of comments opposed are here:<\/p>\n
5949 to 5975<\/a><\/p>\n The submission from the Parkvale Village VOC, provided as an attachment to #5964, is particularly detailed and insightful . #5959 has an interesting angle on ownership of the site.<\/p>\n The bulk of comments in support are here:<\/p>\n 5976 to 6108<\/a><\/p>\n Additional comments opposed, mainly repeating previous submissions, are here:<\/p>\n 6109 to 6118<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Although the deadline for public comments for the 5th Round of public consultation on construction of two residential tower blocks at Area 6f closed two weeks ago, it appears that the record is still incomplete. From the comments posted to date, those opposed continue to detail the unanswered questions, and raise new questions on the … Continue reading 6f Round 5. Many Unanswered Questions<\/span>